Talk:Nude per l'assassino/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by DAP388 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DAP388 (talk · contribs) 19:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
This article is virtually empty of any errors. It's a well-written article, but I have a few concerns.
- This is just a minor gripe, but is there any information on who portrayed the killer?
- Solvi Stubing? I could track down some brief biographical info on her but nothing turned up directly related to the film itself. What kind of thing do you think would be useful? GRAPPLE X 01:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oh. My bad. LOL, I got a little confused for some reason.
- Solvi Stubing? I could track down some brief biographical info on her but nothing turned up directly related to the film itself. What kind of thing do you think would be useful? GRAPPLE X 01:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- "Bloody Disgusting's Mike Pereira noted that the film "reeks of amateur hour", citing its "dead-on-arrival pacing" and "terrible filmmaking and acting"; Pereira ultimately rated the film 0.5 out of 5." I'm not really liking the phrasing of this sentence. Perhaps this would be better, "In his 0.5 out of 5 star review, Bloody Disgusting's Mike Pereira asserted that the film "reeks of amateur hour", and particularly reprimanded the "dead-on-arrival pacing" and "terrible filmmaking and acting."
- Hmm. I could split it into two sentences, as "Bloody Disgusting's Mike Pereira rated Nude per l'assassino 0.5 out of 5, writing that it "reeks of amateur hour". Pereira felt that the film featured "dead-on-arrival pacing" and "terrible filmaking and acting". GRAPPLE X 01:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sounds good.
- Hmm. I could split it into two sentences, as "Bloody Disgusting's Mike Pereira rated Nude per l'assassino 0.5 out of 5, writing that it "reeks of amateur hour". Pereira felt that the film featured "dead-on-arrival pacing" and "terrible filmaking and acting". GRAPPLE X 01:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
That's all I can think of. —DAP388 (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for giving this a review, I appreciate it. GRAPPLE X 01:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Np. Everything looks good, so it's a pass. :) —DAP388 (talk) 01:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)