Talk:Number needed to vaccinate

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

NNV

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

NNV should be 1/ARR not 1/prevalence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.63.114 (talk) 01:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

"derivation" wrong?

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

you say: "Derivation: NNV is the statistical inverse of incidence i.e. 1/incidence. In other words, in case of the vaccination for a disease with incidence of 1 per 1000, the NNV is 1000." this seems to ignore the herd-immunity-percentage coming into play to prevent a case. if an epidemic breaks down at 65 % of the population being immune it seems to follow that the NNV to prevent one 'incidence' is 650. right or wrong?

and how can it be explained that supposedly the NNV for one vaccine is lower than for another? is it because you vaccinate more people if the success-rate of a vaccination is not one or 100 %? so if in a given case the herd-immunity-rate is 50 %, but the vaccine-efficacy is also only 50 %, you would vaccinate 1000 with the incidence being 1/1000. HilmarHansWerner (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I made this correction; I hope I have not added new errors. JBritnell (talk) 11:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic