Talk:Numeronym

Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash^talk 17:38, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Category:Numeronyms ?

Might be useful to add a Category:Numeronyms. DFH (talk) 10:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Done. Some tidy up may be required. I found a few anomalies. DFH (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 February 11 for discussion that led to deletion. – Fayenatic London 17:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Pronunciation

Can someone add pronunciation? I'm not sure if the accent is on the first or second syllable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.172.16 (talk) 17:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

K9 is a Homonym?

Don't the numbers in a numeronym refer to the number of letters ommited from the abbreviation? In contrast, a homophone is a relies on the sounds of words/numbers/letters, so K-9 isn't really a numeronym but rather a homophone (at least according to wikipedia here. Aren't better numeronyms for the introduction, like maybe i18n or l10n which are more widely used and recognized and obey all the "rules" of numeronyms? Hobsonlane (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Numeronym. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160205021243/http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/16/magazine/the-way-we-live-now-9-16-01-on-language-muggles.html to http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/16/magazine/the-way-we-live-now-9-16-01-on-language-muggles.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120603125520/http://articles.philly.com/2010-04-23/news/25212422_1_pinatubo-volcano-iceland to http://articles.philly.com/2010-04-23/news/25212422_1_pinatubo-volcano-iceland

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Listcruft

The examples page of this page is growing and featuring a large amount of, frankly, unnotable examples of this example. Has anyone really referred to numeronyms themselves as 'n7ms'? I think we should trim down the examples list, for example only to those with citations to show their notability. I don't want to remove large swathes of items without a second opinion though - 5.148.40.98 (talk) 10:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

I made a start on it — several of the cited items were dead links to projects or companies that used a numeronym-style name. Removed and added some citations for others. Still worth further cleanup & explanation if anyone's interested.– The Fiddly Leprechaun · Catch Me! 23:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

CR7 ?

It's confusing to see CR7 here, the 7 has neither the function of repeating letters (as in W3C), nor of counting them (as in i18n), even though "Ronaldo" has 7 letters. It's simply a digit (his shirt number) - does this count as Numeronym? WW2 isn't, or is it? — MFH:Talk 14:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Only short forms?

Would the Neo-Nazi use of 88 qualify? 9/11? 404 (error message)? --Error (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Is Y2K also a numeronym? Why? Please improve definition what a numeronym is and ain't.

The article Year 2000 problem states that "Y2K is a numeronym". As this is written there in its very specific context, I trust that that's true. But another confirmation here would be appreciated too.

And in any way I'd wish to have a clearer definition here what a numeronym is and more importantly also what a numeronym ain't. Both in a declarative nature and with examples to grasp it more concretely.

I for one, not very familiarized with the concepts, was not sure whether "Y2K" was not rather an acronym than a numeronym.

Would be great if some expert(s) could improve the article in that regard! PutzfetzenORG (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Definition of numeronym

The article currently begins 'A numeronym is a word, usually an abbreviation, composed partially or wholly of numerals.' I've just learned the word 'atg8ylation' which *contains* an abbreviation (ATG8), but doesn't otherwise fit into one of the categories listed at present. Consensus on the definition and, as PutzfetzenORG says above, what it excludes, would be welcome! Addedentry (talk) 21:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't think "numeronym" has a consistent definition. The one given in the article is intentionally vague to reflect that (it says "usually an abbreviation" but doesn't claim that they're always abbreviations). If there are reliable sources that describe "ATG8" or "atg8ylation" as numeronyms we can always add an "other" category. Justin Kunimune (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)