Talk:Nuon Chea

Latest comment: 4 years ago by ThadeusOfNazereth in topic Disputed edits to the lede

Untitled

edit

In the german wikipedia this guy is pardoned. May someone clarify?

Nuon Chea was pardoned when he surrendered to the government in 1998, as Ieng Sary and Khieu Samphan were pardoned in 1996. The KR tribunal has not yet begun to prosecute but it seems likely that these pardons will not protect them. Paxse 03:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Big Fish?

edit

Is this some technical term to refer to the top tier of that murderous gang? If yes, it should be wikilinked. If not, paraphrased. Can somebody clarify? Bazuz (talk) 11:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Apparently it's Associated Press-speak from A U.N.-backed court in Cambodia is expected to try the remaining four Khmer Rouge leaders -- the "Big Fish" -- in mid 2011, a senior Cambodian official said Tuesday.[1] Sean.hoyland - talk 12:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, thumbs up for you then for figuring that out! But I think it might be potentially confusing for the readers; also, as you pointed out that the term comes from AP it's probably not standard or common. Therefore, I'll rewrite the page. Thanks! Bazuz (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nuon Chea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Nuon Chea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disputed edits to the lede

edit

Over the past day, a variety of accounts have attempted to insert the following edit into the lede.

Chea was appealing his cases but death stopped the appeals and guilty convictions stand.

I don't have any stake in this edit, but some editors have expressed concern over the fact that this information A) is not properly cited and B) isn't a necessary edition. What do y'all think about this edit being inserted into the lede? ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 17:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

it is of huge importance, either keep it here or put it under trial, but since the intro paragraph says he was serving his sentence and died then naturally with death his conviction stands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.255.56.104 (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
If he was serving a sentence, then why would his conviction not stand? We don't need to clarify every single thing, especially something that there shouldn't be any disagreement about. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 17:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply