Talk:Nusret Imamović
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Santasa99 in topic Pattern of biased edits
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nusret Imamović article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pattern of biased edits
editYour editing pattern on Bosnia and Herzegovina shows considerable bias - from mass removal of official B-H flag icons from Infoboxes in articles on Croatian majority settlements and towns, to mass inclusion of unconstitutional/unofficial symbols of Croatian Community of H-B into articles on Bosnia and Herzegovina official institution of government, to complete chage of article scope on Tropolje into some Croatian medieval entity, to removal of referenced prose by claiming that sources doesn't speak about it - all in all it is a pattern that makes me wonder if you are WP:Not here ౪ Santa ౪99° 07:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- User:Governor Sheng remove unwarranted categorization, for which you have no argument at all, otherwise I will move this issue to administrators' noticeboard--౪ Santa ౪99° 07:25, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please, report me if you wish. First of all, removal of flags is in accordance with MOS:FLAG, second of all, the communities do not have Croatian majority - majority of them does, since I started with the Canton 10 (which has a Croatian majority). Your accusation of me being biased is completely nonsensical and ridicilous. All my edits, including Tropolje have explanations (like I explained on the talk page, and after your report, will do more explaining if necessary). And instead of explaining your long-standing disruption of the satus quo on this article, you turned the discussion about me or my alleged bias. Governor Sheng (talk) 07:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, I will, I have no other option. As for the removal of flags, it is based on your misinterpretation of MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and ignoring very specific line in that guideline, which is clear about where the icon should or shouldn't be included: Human geographic articles – for example, settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes.. You removed Category:Serb communities in Croatia from Karanac article giving baseless argument that:
Legally, there are no Serb communities in Croatia, except those beloning to the Joint Council of Municipalities
. And this is just a tip of an iceberg in this pattern of editing. ౪ Santa ౪99° 08:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)- So your point being what exactly? Governor Sheng (talk) 08:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Then, another baseless argument, offered for this article is "disruption of the long-standing status quo" - I urge you to go and read WP:STONEWALLING and WP:STONEWALL. My point is that you have showed enough in your pattern of (disruptive) editing to make me wonder if you are really here to build encyclopedia or to right great wrongs; that you have removed those icons en masse, removed Category:Serb communities in Croatia, included en masse flag icons of unconstitutional flag into articles about official institutions of one country, all under the false pretense that you are respecting and following particular policies and guidelines. Just like here by calling attention to long-standing status quo.--౪ Santa ౪99° 08:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Article clearly describe terrorism actions and events in Syria.--౪ Santa ౪99° 14:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Then, another baseless argument, offered for this article is "disruption of the long-standing status quo" - I urge you to go and read WP:STONEWALLING and WP:STONEWALL. My point is that you have showed enough in your pattern of (disruptive) editing to make me wonder if you are really here to build encyclopedia or to right great wrongs; that you have removed those icons en masse, removed Category:Serb communities in Croatia, included en masse flag icons of unconstitutional flag into articles about official institutions of one country, all under the false pretense that you are respecting and following particular policies and guidelines. Just like here by calling attention to long-standing status quo.--౪ Santa ౪99° 08:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- So your point being what exactly? Governor Sheng (talk) 08:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, I will, I have no other option. As for the removal of flags, it is based on your misinterpretation of MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and ignoring very specific line in that guideline, which is clear about where the icon should or shouldn't be included: Human geographic articles – for example, settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes.. You removed Category:Serb communities in Croatia from Karanac article giving baseless argument that:
- Please, report me if you wish. First of all, removal of flags is in accordance with MOS:FLAG, second of all, the communities do not have Croatian majority - majority of them does, since I started with the Canton 10 (which has a Croatian majority). Your accusation of me being biased is completely nonsensical and ridicilous. All my edits, including Tropolje have explanations (like I explained on the talk page, and after your report, will do more explaining if necessary). And instead of explaining your long-standing disruption of the satus quo on this article, you turned the discussion about me or my alleged bias. Governor Sheng (talk) 07:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)