Talk:Nut rage incident

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ntdb.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 8 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Nut rage incident. No such user (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

---

Macadamia nuts controversy → Nut rage – The incident is known as Nut rage in the foreign press. No one will find it in the news under Macadamia nuts controversy. Can we move the page back to that title? Yoninah (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

• Support move. Yoninah (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Support +{{subst:Requested move}}— Revi 14:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

• Support per COMMONNAME - "Macadamia nuts controversy" brings in a mere 89,500 results where as "Nur rage" brings in 16,900,000 results so I assume the latter is far more known than the former. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 15:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
• Support in principle, but suggest alternative candidate names "Nut rage incident" or "Nut rate controversy", since the article is not about a general rage phenomenon relating to nuts (e.g., as contrasted with Road rage). —BarrelProof (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

• I agree with BarrelProof's suggestion; "incident" sounds more neutral for Wikipedia purposes. Yoninah (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
• Seconded – BarrelProof's suggestions are better. --IJBall (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

• Support move to Nut rage incident, BarrelProof's reasoning is valid, this is not like "road rage". And incident is definitely preferable to controversy.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

More on what Heather Cho did

http://flightclub.jalopnik.com/korean-air-to-be-sanctioned-for-nut-rage-nepotism-fiasc-1672629452 tells of reported throwing of something and pushing. 211.225.34.166 (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I used your link to write in one of the controversy sections. HanSangYoon (talk) 03:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Heather Cho

Per WP:BLP1E, there is not enough material here to build a standalone biography. I suggest merging the one actual biographical paragraph and redirecting to Nut rage incident. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

No objections for more than two weeks, merged and redirected. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Possible GA?

Are any editors interested to bring this article to GA status? sst✈^discuss 16:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Glaring inconsistency

Lede says crew chief was forced to kneel; text says it was the flight attendant. Nowhere is it said whether it was both that had to kneel before Cho; therefore, something is sorely amiss. XavierItzm (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Recent news coverage

Looks like there's been some more related coverage here. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, as Heather Cho redirects here. This would be the place to add it. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

image "macadamia nuts in a bowl"

Why on earth is this picture used here... There is no reference to macadamia nuts, just to nuts, and she didn't even want them in a bowl. The image adds nothing to the article. As its description says, it's just a picture of "macadamia nuts in a bowl". The image should be deleted. Ikjbagl (talk) 22:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Oops- I missed that it actually was about macadamia nuts... The image still really adds nothing. Ikjbagl (talk) 22:56, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

I agree the image is a bit "gratuitous". - Ahunt (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)