Talk:Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt

Tyler Hebert's Review

First off the first figure (box with all the info) looks really good and helps the reader understand the exact location of your topic. Your information is very good but based on other peoples pages I think you need more info to make the page longer. The background information is good. Maybe throw in some maps or cross sections of the area to show the structure of the area.

Review from Hongcheng Guo

1. I like the first paragraph. It gives definition, overview, and current research condition, but it should give a map showing the location, "Canada" and the coordinates are not "friendly" to read. 2. History and geography section is good and it can logically introduced the age problem. 3. I wish to see some geological maps aside from the photos in geology section. I think maps would match your words (showing those three units), which could make this section better. Hongcheng Guo (talk) 07:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Tasha's Review

I appreciate that there were links to related pages to provide background on terms and subjects that some might not know about, and it seems to cover the information about the NGB well. My only concern is the fact that the age descriptions kept changing (ae, 3XXXX Ma instead of 3.XXX Ga) also, the average person reading the article may not know what Ma and Ga mean, so maybe write these terms out.

Corrections

Log and notes of correction edits Mfrphoto (talk) 07:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Units confusion: Although 1 Billion = 1,000 million, it is confusing to switch units. Adding clarification. "uvvuagittuq was dated to be a minimum of 3.7 billion years old." adding this is 3,750 million Mfrphoto (talk) 07:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

There seem to be some discrepancies between this article and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acasta_Gneiss and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_dated_rocks Oldest dated rocks but I have not tried to correct because it needs someone with more knowledge. Mfrphoto (talk) 07:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)