Talk:Nyang River
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nyang River article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisement?
editHow is this article supposed to read partisan or like an ad? Yes, it cites Chinese government websites, but these are labeled as such - or is there a concern that they are not reliable? Sandstein 17:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Are you serious ?--Santasa99 (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
You have a river article, which is practically copy/pasted from (Chinese or whichever) government leaflet for busyness investors in hydro-energy, and you ask me this !?--Santasa99 (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
On top of all this, link to govt site appears to be broken ! So, I guess you removed my edits after all, without even checking all aspect of new article outlook, while reverting Chinese government broken link in the process - which I also removed in my edits, by the way.--Santasa99 (talk) 17:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't copy-paste anything. I used information from that source. Why do you think that it is not reliable for the facts at issue? Sandstein 20:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
The Nyang River article - hydro-energy lobby manual for potential investors
editI tried to improve this article a little bit, or I thought that I know how to do that, so that it doesn't sounds like an advert or excerpt from Chinese government manual for potential investors in hydro-energy busyness.
Fortunately there are bots around here, on Wikipedia, as well as "flesh & blood" admins, smart and vigilant enough, who keep close eye at edits like mine, so when edit without explanation appears, they act quickly and revert it, without unnecessary considerations.
I'm not sure if my edit was reverted by the former or the latter kind, but I'm 120% certain that inputs like this: "According to a Chinese government website aimed at investors", around which entire article revolves, looks rather suspicious in any encyclopedia.--Santasa99 (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
There's another Nyang River in Samzhubzê (Shigatse)
editThere's another Nyang River passing through Samzhubzê District - it's Chinese name is 年楚河 (niánchǔ hé). --katpatuka (talk) 18:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)