Talk:Nydalen metro station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This article, which is for a quite new railway station, is compliant with the requirements. Many of the references are in Norsk, but they appear to verify the claims. I'm therefore awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to do the review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Couldn't this be collapsed? __meco (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Of course, but there is no point in doing so, unless there are sections with resolved comments. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Copenhagen Metro stations/archive1 for an example. --Eisfbnore (talk) 19:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)