Talk:O'Reilly Auto Parts/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2604:2D80:DF8C:5F00:D45:D3A5:CB2A:41F9 in topic Mad Men Reference Seems to be For a Fictional Company
Archive 1

Speedy Deletion Dispute

How in the heck is this considered spam when I created this page, to talk about a company in Wiki fashion. If you condsider this page Spam you should delete all pages that talk about companies, like Auto Zone, Wal-Mart, ETC. Sawblade05 17:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

ORLY? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zilla3 (talkcontribs) 07:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

YARLY! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.235.249 (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
NOWAY! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.9.225.50 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Changes

Frankly, this article is a mess. I've cleaned it up quite a bit but it still needs some major work. Wilybadger (talk) 01:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Name Change

Like" Advanced Auto Parts" changing to "Advance Auto parts," O Reilly Auto Parts was once "O'Reily's" For some strange reason, all references to the old names are being removed. I remember my local "O'Reily's, and I remember the "'s." Just as I remember "Advanced Auto Parts." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.53.177 (talk) 16:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Mad Men Reference Seems to be For a Fictional Company

The article alleges that O'Reilly was "well known" for hiring discrimination which, having lived in Springfield most of my life I don't doubt, but the linked article refers to an episode of Mad Men which deals with a fictional auto parts store in another state. If Wikipedia has an actual source for racism on behalf of O'Reilly, it should be listed here; it seems borderline libelous to make the accusation here based purely on a fictional company within the same industry with nothing else connected the two. I recommend the line be removed at least until a source can be produced.--2604:2D80:DF8C:5F00:D45:D3A5:CB2A:41F9 (talk) 23:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)