Talk:OMAC (Buddy Blank)

Opening heading

I propose for this to be merged with OMACs.

I disagree. The two are vaguely (sp) related, but thats it. Jack Kirby's Buddy Blank has little to do with metahuman-hunting cyborgs. The two are different enough to deserve their own articles. --DrBat 16:29, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

merge

Formal merge. OMACs are a concept derived from the One-Man Army Corps, both in concept and appearance. There is no reason the article should not be merged back into the relevent section of this article. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Survey

• Merge per my nom. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Do not merge Mostly different appearance. Brian Boru is awesome 01:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

• Do not merge. They're distantly related. As I posted above, "The two are vaguely (sp) related, but thats it. Jack Kirby's Buddy Blank has little to do with metahuman-hunting cyborgs. The two are different enough to deserve their own articles." --DrBat 02:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

• Do not merge Not the same thing. --Basique 17:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

• Do not merge They are similar in name and mohawk only. --Michael Podgorski 06:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Discussion closed. decison is not to merge. Brian Boru is awesome 02:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

I do not think they should be merged because, when reading Infinite Crisis, Brother Eye refers to the OMAC's as the Omni Mind And Community, not the one man Army Corps

Merge of OMACs ... again.

• merge/nom - The reimagined OMAC's are clearly derived from the Corps, evidence in appearance, powers and conceptualization. The relations gab between the two, that closed the discussion, has since closed as recent Countdown's and Outsiders reflect the OMACs are fully incorporated into the Corps mythos and current continuity. There is no reason why the two should be separate article, as the Corps and OMACs could be merged to make an article for less than 20 KiB. - 66.109.248.114 (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Do Not Merge - Just because one thing is derived from the other doesn't mean they have to be merged. I also think that a combined page would be a terrible mess. Better to have the existing pages to allow each of the elements to be discussed (the versions of Buddy Blank, for example.) Duggy 1138 (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • There is a clear precidence in this case for merging, and the characters involved while at one point were quite different interpretations, the two have become more closely reconciled in recent print. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 22:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC).
• Do Not Merge - They are not the same thing, so it makes sense to have two separate articles. Why a second merger vote after the first consensus? --Xero (talk) 18:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

No consensus. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 22:47, 7 August 2008 (UTC).

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

---

One-Man Army Corps → OMAC (Buddy Blank) — The character is called "OMAC", not "One-Man Army Corps." One-Man Army Corps (talk) 01:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.