Talk:OSCA MT4

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Motorsport

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 7 January 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved due to COMMONNAME (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 20:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

O.S.C.A. MT-4 → OSCA MT4 – Simplified version of the name as per common usage. Nearly all motorsports entries in WP style the company name OSCA. Article uses "MT4" rather than MT-4 throughout, as does the German entry and Italian article. "Osca" is unsuitable since it is an acronym after all. In older sources, I also see MT 4 used with some frequency. There is no single right answer (although "MT-4" feels inappropriate, so I think the most elegant and easy to type version should win out. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. In case it comes up (since the parent article is O.S.C.A.) I would also support moving this to O.S.C.A. MT4 as a second choice. A7V2 (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom (and also support A7V2's suggested second choice). DH85868993 (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic