Talk:OU Daily

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Popularity

edit

Who says the newspaper is not popular on campus? With a circulation of 25,000 I don't know if that's an accurate statement.


I'm the source of that statement. The "circulation" is free distribution. Because it's free, a lot of people read it. By "popular," I suppose I meant "well-liked" -- and The Daily is pretty certainly not that. Lobosolo 16:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lobosolo is right. This is mainly so because the newspaper has a liberal bias to it and the University of Oklahoma is a fairly conservative campus. Fineric 05:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

This article has NO references. It needs to have references in order to comply with the Wikipedia rules (WP:Citing sources). If it doesn't get resolved in the next 30 days, I will file the article for deletion. Thanks! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 21:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Oklahoma Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply