Talk:Oak Felder
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Ammarpad in topic Requested move 18 May 2020
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Requested move 18 May 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 16:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Warren "Oak" Felder → Oak Felder – This article was recently moved on the strength of one article, which refers to him as "Oak" Felder in the headline, once as Warren "Oak" Felder in the text and otherwise as Oak (as in Oak says). It appears to me that there is not sufficient evidence from the sole article to support the move, nor am I aware that there is any reason that his familiar name is not simply Oak Felder Richhoncho (talk) 12:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Procedurally, an undiscussed move like what took place on 10 May can just be rapidly reverted without a need for an RM. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 17:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.