Talk:Obsessed (Olivia Rodrigo song)/GA1
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Dxneo in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 00:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dxneo (talk · contribs) 04:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Thank you for this submission. I will be reviewing this in the next couple of days although I have exams coming up, but I'll take my chances. Let's have fun!
- I look forward to it.--NØ 16:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
- Key÷
Queries and suggestions
Quoting from the article
Comments:
editProse:
edit- Lead + quick facts
- Background
They wrote over 100 songs
. Cross checking with this source, isn't that a figure of speech? If yes, why does it read like they literally wrote over 100 songs for the album?
- Looking at the same source, I think it seems to discuss it as a literal figure and not hyperbole. "For Guts, they wrote more than 100 songs - a figure that 'sounds way more impressive than it actually is'" is the quote, which seems to indicate the number actually exceeded 100, at least according to my interpretation. The figure of speech version would probably go "100s of songs".--NØ 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Cool dxneo (talk) 06:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Composition
- Critical reception
- Commercial performance
- "
Elsewhere
" is a redundant term. I've seen it flagged multiple times while patrolling PR.
- Removed.--NØ 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Music video
- Fascinating stuff. A screenshot from the music video wouldn't hurt.
- I feel like people would argue a screenshot doesn't meet the non-free criteria as it would be replaceable with a free picture of a beauty pageant, although actually including a picture of a random beauty pageant would look absurd.--NØ 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- True. This is GA and a non-free screenshot is the first thing you notice on this piece. Maybe we might find an image related to the video somewhere. Come to think of it, that is the only standalone article of a music video I've ever seen around here. dxneo (talk) 06:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
References
edit- Clean! No red source detected. I like how they did not leave out the subscription tag on this source.
Plagiarism
editViolation unlikely. Earwig finds 15.3% of similarities from an OCC which is one or two quotes.
Broad in its coverage
editNeutral
editStable
edit- Last edited almost two weeks ago.
Media files
edit- 10% of 2:50 = 17 seconds. The audio file 18 seconds, I believe this happened due to rounding off.
- That is correct. If the file is downloaded offline, it's the permissible 17 second duration.--NØ 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Non-free cover art is fine and the background and promotion image is also fine and well captioned.
Verdict
edit- Definitely GA material, just waiting for the nominator to address the above mentioned issues. dxneo (talk) 02:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to thank the reviewer and I have addressed the issues.--NØ 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, not gonna waste my time on changing the icons. I'm passing this Thank you. dxneo (talk) 06:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to thank the reviewer and I have addressed the issues.--NØ 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.