Talk:Occultation (Islam)

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Albertatiran in topic What is the issue

72.188.118.58 (talk) 23:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)The article should be renamed to Occultation (Shia Islam) or Occultation (Shi'ism). This will make it less ambigious.Reply

The Occultation

edit

I note the sentence: "During this period, from 874-914 AD, the deputies represented him and acted as agents between him and his followers." yet thereafter all references are to the year 941 AD. Have I misunderstood, or is there a typographical error here, please? Dawright12 (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 20 September 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Occultation (Islam)  — Amakuru (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply



The Occultation → ? – Per WP:THE articles should not start with "The"; using one to distinguish Occultation from The Occultation is doubly bad. Possible alternatives are disambiguators Occultation (Islam) or Occultation (Shia Islam) or other; or the Arabic name Ghaybah. jnestorius(talk) 15:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Definition

edit

The page uses “occultation” to define “occultation”. 2600:1017:B80D:812E:2931:4CD9:11F7:40D0 (talk) 10:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

New edits

edit

The new edits are intended to address the following issues, among other things.

  • The article has lots of unsourced or poorly sourced content.
  • Extinct Shia sects can be summarized into "Other views" so as not to divert attention from the existing branches.
  • There doesn't seem to be a good reason for including Bahai views in a distinctively Shia article. Same for the Druze.
  • "Secular democracy during Occultation" is a large section that promotes a particular political view, and it's misplaced and irrelevant here at best.
  • "Scholarly observations" looks like the type of place where opposing editors would go back and forth and off-topic. It's hardly justified here. Albertatiran (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Responsibility of the believers in the age of occultations

edit

Responsibilitys of the believers in the age of occultations in roman English 2409:40F2:1B:9DD4:4497:6CFF:FE57:3750 (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

What is the issue

edit

@Albertatiran your attitude makes people not want to contribute to Wikipedia.

you should at least show that you appreciate the work of the fellow editor by explaining what could be done to improve it rather than discard the whole thing Belomaad (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Much time is spent undoing the damage that you do by repeatedly and untiringly inserting sectarian and often poorly-sources propaganda into various articles. Appreciation is reserved for editors who have good faith and it's very difficult to assume that about you, considering the pattern in your edits. Albertatiran (talk) 07:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply