Untitled

edit

Correct(ed) link to MBARI should be:

http://www.mbari.org/sinkers-provide-missing-piece-in-deep-sea-puzzle/

I can't see how reference links are edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3398:B890:5C4F:CE4A:F888:4632 (talk) 23:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Klcaroly. Peer reviewers: Epifanij, Nrchristman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Documentation for amount of carbon in oceans

edit

The into states: "The oceans contain around 36,000 gigatons of carbon." What is the documentation for this assessment? When was this measurement done? Has it changed since then? etc.

Thanks. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography for planned article improvements

edit

Emerson, S., & Hedges, J. (2008). Chemical oceanography and the marine carbon cycle. Cambridge University Press.

Sarmiento, J. L., & Gruber, N. (2002). Sinks for anthropogenic carbon. Physics today, 55(8), 30-36.

Zeebe, R. E., & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. (2001). CO2 in seawater: equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes (No. 65). Gulf Professional Publishing.

Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., ... & Jones, C. (2014). Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 465-570). Cambridge University Press.

Dce725 (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer review edits

edit

Good topic that I wish I had time to contribute more to. I think it could be most improved by a strong opening paragraph that ties it to a unifying narrative throughout the article. It looks like you have a lot of outline and draft still in development, so I can't wait to see how it turns out. Interesting stuff! Mosesm21 (talk) 01:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oops! Just realized I edited the wrong sandbox for this article! Mosesm21 (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Revised Edition

edit

We are working on a revised edition of this page, currently housed in a sandbox. That revised page went live temporarily today (for about 4 hours). The page was not ready to be released, and it was pulled. The revised edition will be posted soon. Dce725 (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC) Revised article posted 12/6/2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dce725 (talkcontribs) 01:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Carbon-14

edit

It occurred to me while reading Carbon-14, related to atmospheric nuclear testing, that the decay rate of C14 in the atmosphere is related to the rate of exchange between atmosphere and ocean. I suspect that this isn't the best place to mention it, but it seemed better than the C14 article. If there is a better place, I will post there. Gah4 (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply