Talk:Odorrana graminea
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Frogboi123 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Britneys99, ShawnMohammed, Turturenhydra.
- Peer reviewed article - great detail. Added speciesbox and picture Britneys99 (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
— Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Updates to article
editThis article was updated with sections on: Taxonomy, Vocalizations, Conservation, Diet, Anti-microbial defense, Gut microbiome, and Physiology. The previous article was kept unchanged, but sorted into categories of "Description" and "Habitat and distribution". Frogboi123 (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments
editI made some grammatical edits and changed around some of the sentences. I also added a picture of the frog that I found using the Wikimedia Commons search engine. I think that the article could focus more on the organism Odorrana graminea, but I think that all information presented is relevant and important. I also think that you could add a map that shows the geographic distribution of this frog. Overall great work! ShawnMohammed (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review Comments
editFirst of all, great job! The contents of your post are very interesting. I especially liked the specific categorization of the post with the use of sub-sections/headings because it makes the readers easier to locate the information that they might be looking for specifically. For the Vocalizations section, you introduced the six basic types of calls of the frog, including short tonal call, long tonal call, multi-note call, tonal call with shallow or no frequency modulation, narrow-band call, and staccato call. If you could find more information about each type of call, it would be great if you could make them into subsections and explain each type in detail. And since the Vocalization section already have subsections (ultrasonic characteristics, auditory sexual differences, nonlinear vocal components, and phonotaxis), maybe you could make a new section for the six basic types of calls and name the section Calling. And the current description of the Vocalization section could be used for the Calling section, and the Vocalization section could have a new description that summarizes the subsections it has. For the Physiology section, one suggestion is to add a picture of an example of the growth defect, if you could find a picture. Turturenhydra (talk) 11:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)