in response to: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject"

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I am referring to the claim that there is a conflict of interest with this subject (Ofer Bergman) & would like to deny any such conflict.

Pls remove remark

Ebeloo (talk) 14:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ofer Bergman. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used in this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The file "The Science of Managing Our Digital Stuff" by Ofer Bergman and Steve Whittaker.jpg on Wikimedia Commons has been nominated for speedy deletion. View the deletion reason at the Commons file description page. Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

This article seems, IMHO, to be an attempt to present the subject as a major influential scholar. I'm not sure that the sources actually support this. The problem is that the article tries to say far more than the individual sources show. I think in fact that this article should become more bibliographical, without so many accompanying claims of importance attached to different aspects of the research. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply