Talk:Offline reader

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

SLMR in table?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does anybody have enough information on Silly Little Mail Reader (SLMR) to add it to the table? At one time it was fairly popular. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Scope of #Lists?

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Anton.bersh:Two recent edits removed the older entries from Offline reader#Lists, citing Write the article first as the reason. WP:TAF certainly justifies correcting redlinks, but removing the readers themselves is less clear. Is the list intended to provide historical data, or only to mention current readers?

I believe that there is value in acknowledging how we got here, and, e.g., SOUP, was certainly notable in its day. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 13:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Chatul: I restored the older version (reversed my deletions), but I'm still unhappy about lack of sources which would support this information. The whole article is basically unsourced. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic