Talk:Ofuda
Latest comment: 10 years ago by DrKiernan in topic Why title is "Ofuda" and not "O-fuda"?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Is there really a type of ofuda with the inscription 悪霊退散 Akuryo Taisan (Evil spirit, begone)?--Ki no Senshi (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Japanese Wikipedia. "Onmyōdō" is said to be one of the origin.
editWhy title is "Ofuda" and not "O-fuda"?
editWhy title is "Ofuda" and not "O-fuda, as in the text"? --109.53.223.78 (talk) 23:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved per common name. DrKiernan (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Ofuda → O-fuda – as in the text 109.53.223.78 (talk) 23:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Is there any evidence of what the name should be? Since anyone could edid the article the fact that it uses O-fuda is not in itself proof that it is the correct term since it's possible that the editor who used the term was wrong.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppoese and suggest to use "ofuda" in the text. According to Google ngram viewer, ofuda is more commonly used than o-fuda. Omamori was also changed to use "o-mamori" around the same time and then moved to o-mamori. I undid the unilateral pagemove[1] and changed back to use "ofuda"[2]. --Kusunose
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.