This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It's a three paragraph article on a relatively minor figure, with a few references. It's not a stub. I'll keep reverting that until you provide an argument otherwise. For example, outline what a "complete" article on Ogden Rood would look like with reference to the available literature. Outriggr (talk) 04:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but this article IS a stub. It barely manages to provide enough information to establish notability. A proper article would contain at least: 1) an infobox, 2)a few paragraph section on his (academic) life. (including place and date of birth/death which currently are missing.) 3) a few paragraph section on his ideas and whatever impact those made on the world. 4)Maybe (if really relevant) a section on his art. 5)(maybe) a short bibliography.
And that is just what I can think of with the minimal information I have about him. That the subject is "a relatively minor figure" has absolutely no bearing on whether this article is a stub or not. (TimothyRias (talk) 15:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC))Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
