Talk:Ohio State Route 293

Latest comment: 10 years ago by TCN7JM in topic GA Review
Good articleOhio State Route 293 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 3, 2014Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 293/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 23:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I will review this now. TCN7JM 23:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  1. The mileage in the infobox should be rounded to three decimal places like the one in the lead.
    Fixed.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  2. 0.50 miles south of the village limits of Kirby - the "0.50 miles" can probably just be replaced with "one half mile".
    Done.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  3. Normally, we cite the fact that a railroad the highway crosses over is owned by a certain company, in this case CSX, with the state railroad map. Is that available for Ohio?
    Yes, but outdated. Sticking with DESTAPE.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  4. After a bit more than one mile - needs to use the conversion template so that a metric length shows up as well.
    Done?—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  5. The penultimate sentence of the route description doesn't make sense and should be rewritten.
    Reworded and splitted.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  6. U.S. Route 30 needs to first be written out in the route description, not the history.
    Okay.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I will leave this article on hold for you. You have seven days. TCN7JM 23:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I made a couple of extra fixes myself, but the article now looks ready to be promoted to GA status. Good job. TCN7JM 00:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply