Talk:Ohio State Route 357/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 00:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I'd use {{convert|2.353|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}} in your lead. "the highway runs" - I know what you mean, but this may be confusing for a non-roads oriented person, how does a highway run? "SR 357 is one of two state highways on the Ohio islands of Lake Erie, along with SR 575 on Kelleys Island." - This is an awkward sounding sentence. I am not sure I like the part about not being on the NHS. Usually for a non-NHS route its just left out. May want to seek a second-opinion on this though. AADT? When is this data from? See examples such as Interstate 70 in West Virginia, or Utah State Route 200.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The image is squishing the prose between the infobox and the image. I'd suggest moving the image somewhere else, such as to the right of the Major Intersections list.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Your map citations do not have sections labeled. Could use some non-primary sources, but not a failure point at this stage in the article's life cycle.
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Map needs a caption.
	7. Overall assessment.	GA