Talk:Ohio State Route 716
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Lpangelrob in topic GA Review
Ohio State Route 716 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThis review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 716/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- "The route was truncated in 1973, after remaining intact for almost 40 years." - a bit repetitive, given that the opening date was given in the previous sentence.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Cardinal directions for where the previous alignment was would be helpful. Did the road continue further north, or did it turn east or west prior to its truncation?
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Could use an image, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Good job! Let me know when changes are made. —Rob (talk) 04:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Done - Dan and I have solved the two problems.Mitch32(UP) 00:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Looks good, thanks. —Rob (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Done - Dan and I have solved the two problems.Mitch32(UP) 00:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)