Talk:Ohmu
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I removed Ohmu is the Japanese word for worm. The Japanes word for worm or bug is "mushi". If I remember correctly, Ohmu is written with the kanji big + bug. --imars 09:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Influence on Stacraft
editOhmu influenced Starcraft Reavers(a Protoss unit)
Picture
editShouldn't the picture show a full-grown Ohmu, rather than a juvenile one? This picture misrepresents their size. Amaurea 16:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Unresearched claims
edit"This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims."
I think it needs a reference page stating each of the sources of information (film, manga, etc). If you use literary sources, include the page # if possible. JAF1970 01:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
What a horrible article, original research comparing a fictional creature to woodlouse, sentences that specifically state "not confirmed". I'm removing most of the garbage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
If he really claimed that that is the combination then he must of claimed it somewhere other than a fanboys imagination, find the sources and then put it back with them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Really horrible, when you see a large organized group of cavalry or infantry attacking together magnifictly do you assume they have some psionic ability or hivemind that works together. Anime with a horde of cavalry working together don't look much differntly (aside from the legs, and even then, sometimes, cavalry doesn't always mean horse). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I think that this page should be deleted
editThis page should be deleted or merged into the Nausicaä main page. There's no real reasoning behind it, and it is about a fictional creature. I don't think it's that noteworthy of a subject, and it having it's own article, while the characters don't is pretty stupid. Moocowsrule (talk) 06:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule