Talk:Okama Report
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Okama Report appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 October 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series Okama Report for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2
- ALT1:... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series Okama Report contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2
- Reviewed: Migration (Bonobo album)
Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).
- It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce: The article contains 1550 B of readable prose with the Synopsis section removed, meeting the length requirements for DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Kingoflettuce I have never came across a rule in which an uncited synopsis can't count toward the length. As for notability, do you want to nominate this for AfD to move this nomination along either way? SL93 (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- POerhaps somebody more qualified would like to chime in. It just doesn't pass my smell test. Sorry I must have missed this. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- New reviewer needed. Morgan695 (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - Douban, a social-networking service, falls under WP:UGC and should not be used to verify content.
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Prose length is not an issue, regardless of whether the Synopsis section is included or not. Sourcing is an issue. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 03:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Feminist: Replaced with source deemed reliable in previous discussions here and here. Morgan695 (talk) 05:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Alright. AGF for all Japanese-language sources. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 05:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)