Talk:Oklahoma City Crosstown Expressway

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	Oklahoma
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There should probably be a paragraph about the controversy over destroying the Union Station Railyard. There have been some significant developments in that ongoing struggle that may delay construction. Jbrown84 (talk) 05:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you point us towards some news coverage about it? I hadn't heard that anything new had happened on this front. Looking around a bit I found http://www.okgazette.com/p/12776/a/2195/Default.aspx. I assume this is the development that you are talking about? Djthomp (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Union station is not being destroyed, their is some rerouting of track and of course land from the grounds their are being used however parts of the station were derelict anyway, but it will remain open and their was intentionally room left for expansion if eventually necessary but none is currently planned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.162.247.51 (talk) 09:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Redundant Statement?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think the statement saying "2012: Projected completion date for new Crosstown Expressway" should be changed to "2012: Projected completion date for the westbound side of the Crosstown Expressway." The eastbound side is, as mentioned in the article, already open. It's really saying that both sides of the expressway are yet to open. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.172.101 (talk) 19:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Outdated

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A lot of this article is outdated. Could someone help fix this? Michael73072 (talk) 03:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Oklahoma City Crosstown Expressway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merger from Oklahoma City Boulevard to this article

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

As far as I am aware, Oklahoma City Boulevard uses the same right-of-way as the former alignment of I-40 in Oklahoma City. Considering the maintenance and the size of that article, I don't think it is necessary to keep the Oklahoma City Boulevard article. AlphaBeta135 (talk) 22:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oppose: both just need updating, and a merge would be confusing to readers. They don't follow the same route: Oklahoma City Boulevard leaves the Oklahoma City Crosstown Expressway at 148B, at least according to the current article. Klbrain (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic