Talk:Oklahoma City sonic boom tests

Untitled

It might be useful to include noise power data in section "The sonic booms" in dB (SPL) units, as this would be more meaningful to most people (myself included, actually). It seems that 100 Pa is about 67 dB (SPL), but I'm not comfortable with Acoustics, hence I shall not edit. Please discuss. Cangelis (talk) 02:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Oklahoma City sonic boom tests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.airpower.airuniv.edu/airchronicles/aureview/1971/jul-aug/roberds.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060901061419/http://www.edmondpaper.com:80/detail.php?116294,5,37 to http://www.edmondpaper.com/detail.php?116294,5,37
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061115053037/http://www.noisepollution.org:80/epa/roll9/roll9doc18.pdf to http://www.noisepollution.org/epa/roll9/roll9doc18.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

"Poor response"?

Why are we judging the government'ts response as "poor"? Because htey didn't hand out free money to everyone who showed up claiming that they had a busted window or needed new plasterwork done and that it was the sonic boom's fault? I am sure that 85% of the claims that were brought WERE meritless and were from people seeking "free money". Obviously the government has learned since then that it's a lot easier to just shovel money at everyone who asks for it, but who is wikipedia to judge their response as "poor"? That seems biased. You could say that some people CLAIM it is poor, but stating it as a fact is jumping in on the side of the government's opponents (which this article seems to mostly slant towards anyway...."executing their bretheren with their thunder"? For the love of....this guy should go and talk to some people who were actually executed by their governemnt and see how they pity the poor souls who had to listen to a loud boom every day...up to EIGHT TIMES!!!! Oh, the humanity!

Idumea47b (talk) 04:07, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Human Experimentation in the United States

This article includes a link to the Wikipedia page Human Experimentation in the United States. But there is no reference to this page on the other. If the topic is significant enough to be included on one page, it should be mentioned on the other. 72.104.235.193 (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Boeing 2707 article

In the Boeing 2707 article, it says (at least some) of the flybys were done with the XB-70 (which would be awesome) but I've looked for sources that confirm that, but I haven't found any. I may need to do more reading but I think it should be corrected, let me know if some were done by the Valkyrie (I love the Valkyrie so much) Cheers! <3 Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)