Talk:Oklahoma State Highway 132
Latest comment: 11 years ago by TCN7JM in topic GA Review
![]() | Oklahoma State Highway 132 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Oklahoma State Highway 132/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 20:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Gladly. TCN7JM 20:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Route description
- First of all, this is a pretty short route description for a 65.3-mile route. Is the route really this...boring?
- The second-to-last sentence of the first paragraph is missing a capitalized word at the beginning of the sentence.
- I know Kansas has this, but maybe Oklahoma doesn't. Is there someway to tell what kind of railroad track the route crosses?
- "returning to due north" sounds weird. I'd try to reword this a bit.
- Easily avoidable <verb>ing phrase in the second to last sentence.
- History
- Another <verb>ing in the second sentence.
Lookin' goooood. This one'll go on hold for you to fix this stuff. TCN7JM 21:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Everything fixed except the <verb>ing...is there a reason that should be avoided? As far as I know it's perfectly grammatical. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 22:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- At second glance, both these instances are fine. I was a little trigger happy. I will pass the article now. TCN7JM 22:47, 11 April 2013 (UTC)