Talk:Old Lace (comics)

Fair use rationale for Image:Runaways06.jpg

Image:Runaways06.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Copy and paste move

I attempted to fix the copy and paste move of this page. Some of the edits show up on the Old Lace page. Check the range [1] to see what was changed. I've requested copy and paste move for Old Lace (color) also be fixed, so that history link may become [2] after it is fixed. PaleAqua (talk) 21:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Note on Old Lace's first appearance being available to be read for free in April 2009

This note is currently the second paragraph in "Other Versions".

First, it's not another version; it's regarding the comic book where the character first appeared. So, at a minimum, the note should be moved elsewhere. However, I have no idea where.

This brings up my more important question; is the availability of the digital version of this comic to be read on one day (fifteen years ago, at this point) something that is worthy of being in the Wikipedia entry at all? I hate to discard even interesting trivial data, but I have difficulty in figuring out who would benefit from this.

Just to make the age of the information clear, I added the year this was available to read for free (previously, it just said April 10, with no year listed).

R David Francis (talk) 11:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)