A fact from Old Sycamore Hospital appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Contributing property is an actual designation the NRHP uses to denote significant structures within a historic district. The citation is not really needed because its not an opinion but both the poster at the historic district and the bronze plaque installed in front of the building itself qualify it as a contributing property.
The reverse, a non-contributing property, is insiginificant to the historical character, intergrity and significance of a historic district. Such as say a gas station. So I dropped historical integrity and just left contributing property, as it seems that was the statement you had problems with, the link to the article can just explain what that means. Anyway, try to address things here on the talk page instead of in edit summaries, its just easier that way. A mcmurray22:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
