This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles
Not sure as I'm not sure what notability guidelines are for bridges/structures. De-prodded in any case as it makes little difference to me. Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 13:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you both. I would say the sources on the article are more than sufficient to pass the GNG, and age + listed status + famous engineer + prominent structure in a railway town makes it highly likely that there are more sources to be found. This is one of the smaller ones but all the surviving bridges and viaducts on the L&BR now have articles so it would seem counter productive to create a gap in that coverage. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?16:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
