Talk:Olea capensis

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Olea capensis and Olea laurifolia

edit

Olea laurifolia is no longer recognised as a species, but has been sunk under Olea europaea subsp. africana.

The confusion between Olea laurifolia and Olea capensis subsp macrocarpa came about because there is a description of Olea laurifolia by Sim in 1907 in a publication called ‘Forest Flora of the Cape Colony’ that is based on a specimen of Olea capensis subsp. macrocarpa, and the latter was for some time wrongly called Olea laurifolia. The ‘true’ Olea laurifolia described originally by Lamarck is now recognised to be the same as Olea europaea subsp africana.

So I suspect that the trees in the Knysna area that are called Olea laurifolia are just out of date botanically speaking and should be called Olea capensis subsp macrocarpa.

Olea capensis subsp macrocarpa is variable but the leaves are usually elliptic-ovate

Olea europaea subsp africana is also variable, but its leaves are usually narrowly elliptic, usually less than 15mm wide, and the under surface is usually covered in small scales JubaJoubert (talk) 07:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Olea capensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply