This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
What's wrong with noting that Transnistria isn't just a regular subdivision of Moldova? This is an accepted practice on Wikipedia, cf. Rauf Denktaş. We can also use some variation of the Abkhazia note
The political status of Abkhazia is disputed. Having unilaterally declared independence from Georgia in 1992, Abkhazia is formally recognised as an independent state by 5 UN member states (two other states previously recognised it but then withdrew their recognition), while the remainder of the international community recognizes it as de jure Georgian territory. Georgia continues to claim the area as its own territory, designating it as Russian-occupied territory.
I really think we shouldn't waste much time into this. Transnistria is not a legitimate or internationally recognized entity and to potray someone as having died simply in Transnistria is not neutral and leaves the larger political picture out. I don't really plan on making concessions here because I don't see any other acceptable alternative nor why should the current version be changed. It is true "Transnistria" is not any subdivision in Moldova however Transnistria is in Moldova. I don't know about other cases but I've seen Moldova taking relevance in Transnistria-related topics. See Bender, Moldova, not titled Bender, Transnistria.
Very well, let's tone down. Reading my comment I may not have used the most courteous wording, I apologize for that.
I have tried to find a standard at Category:Transnistrian politicians; we only have articles for three other deceased Transnistrian politicians and only one of them has his place of death in the infobox: Andrey Manoylov, marked as Tiraspol, Transnistria (de facto)/Moldova (de jure). Quite clumsly though it does follow this slash version. It is a point in favor of your version but considering one single article used it prior to yesterday I'd hardly say there is a standard for Transnistria.
I'm fine with asking for a third opinion. We could also start with raising this issue at the talk of the Transnistria article which is watched by many more people. Alaexis¿question?18:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply