Talk:Olsburg, Kansas

Untitled

Surely not a city? user:sjc

Yep, Olsburg is a city, you call and ask yourself:

Olsburg City Of 
317 2nd St
Olsburg, KS  66520
(785) 468-3209 

--mav 20:47 Oct 28, 2002 (UTC)

Reality suspended courtesy of Olsburg City? We need either to redefine what a City is or redefine Olsburg. The 190 people are either living in a shoebox or it isn't a densely populated urban area...sjc

"City", "town", "village", etc have various wildly different legal definitions in various jurisdictions. (See recent flamewars on news:sci.lang about the subject if you've got time to waste.) --Brion 09:53 Oct 29, 2002 (UTC)

I'll take your word for it, Brion. I hereby declare my study a city, though.... user:sjc

Discrepancies

The 'Geography' section states the area as 0.2 mi², but the infobox states the area as 0.1 mi². Which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.160.60 (talk) 00:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Olsburg, Kansas. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.kshs.org/geog/geog_postoffices/search/county:PT

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)