Talk:Olympia (Manet)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Olympia (Manet) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Avant-garde
editIt seems relivent to connect this to the Avant-garde movement as well as it was such a debated piece. Any complaints? --Toric
High class prostitute?
editThe article says she is a high class prostitute, but is that so? Many believe her to be for and of the lower class. See for example Eisenman's 19th Century Art (London, Thames & Hudson, 2002. Page 287).
- I suppose many courtesans were of lower-class extraction, but the surroundings, the oriental shawl, pearl earrings, orchid etc. all denote luxury. This, and the fact that she has a maid, is consistent with her status of high class prostitute. Karl Stas 20:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Salon?
editJust clarifying that his work was displayed (and caused controversey) when displayed at the Paris Salon, not the Exhibiton of Rejects? I remember reading that someone organised an annex to the true Salon. Just wondering. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.69.15 (talk) 23:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Edouard Manet - Olympia - Google Art Project 3.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 23, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-06-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
#c-Crisco_1492-2014-06-06T01:27:00.000Z-File:Edouard_Manet_-_Olympia_-_Google_Art_Project_3.jpg){kind=link}
Far too warm
editThe editor has never seen the picture and yet felt entitled to edit the colours. This [1] blog gives a good impression of its true appearance. All the editor has done here is transfer it into Adobe Photoshop and up its warmth some 30% or so. The result is simply horrible. What a joke. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 04:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Addendum: I posted about the issue at Commons:Village pump/Copyright here (at 11. Faithful representation). Coat of Many Colours (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)