This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI think this notable mess can be improved. Please start a discussion at WP:AfD if necessary. Bearian 19:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I took a crack at it. Anyone? Bearian 20:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- I removed he section of appearances at different cities, but there's more to do. DGG (talk) 22:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Dubious
editThe article smakcs of advertisement. It is presenting the campaign's own words as fact. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 10:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
I think there's no better source on the nature and goals of the campaign than the campaign's own statements. But other sources should be used to talk about darfur itself. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 07:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Western Bias and Eurocentric
edithttp://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/brendan_oneill/2008/04/the_chinese_burden.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.64.154 (talk) 10:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Name & Scope of article
editAlthough this article is devoted entirely to the Olympics, "Dream for Darfur" is actually a larger project -- as is quite evident from their website. While their main focus has been on the Olympics, they also appear to be making efforts in other areas. The phrase "Olympic Dream for Darfur" should not be conflated with the project name "Dream for Darfur", which is used throughout the website. So I suggest moving the article to Dream for Darfur, and enlarging its scope accordingly -- with the Olympics obviously continuing to get the lion's share of the article for the time being. Cgingold (talk) 08:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)