Talk:Om Puri/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Om Puri. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Incorrect link

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The link to Aakrosh directs to Suniel Shetty's Aakrosh!--Nitin 06:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

The year of birth is given as 1950 in the main article and 1945 in the profile. Which one is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.22.252 (talk) 07:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Place of Birth

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is this "Sanaur" ? Never heard of it. Are you sure it is not Sangrur ? Jon Ascton (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Marriage years

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

1906-2009??????????????? he was born in 1950, I am sure he was not married before then — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.56.240.187 (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Om Puri.jpg Nominated for Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Om Puri.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Om Puri.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Need Protection

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

I think this page must need Semi-Protection. Gurvinder09 (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Why? None of the recent edits appear to be contentious. Philg88 ^♦talk 20:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Why Not? Who knows about future why not to take step now? Gurvinder09 (talk) 05:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Because Wikipedia policy mandates that we don't use page protection as a preemptive measure against something that might happen in the future. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Agree Thank You for all the information you know much better than me. Gurvinder | Talk 06:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)