Talk:Omi (title)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 31 December 2023
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 31 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Omi to Omi (title). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 31 December 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
– No indication that this is the primary topic: doesn't get many pageviews and doesn't register on the first few pages of Google Books and Scholar results for omi -author:omi
. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Crouch, Swale. There are 34 bulleted entries listed upon the Omi (disambiguation) page, with no indication that renown of the ancient Japanese hereditary title has remained at such an elevated level that it dwarfs the combined notability of the remaining 33 entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.