Talk:OmniTRAX

Learn more about this page

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States: Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Connection to scandal in BC

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I surely won't add anything until I have my facts straight, but OmniTRAX figures in the scandal in British Columbia which so far is described, partly, in Wikipedia as BC Legislature Raids, which has to do (among other things) with OmniTRAX's bidding on the sale of BC Rail; a bribe was solicited from OmniTRAX by consultants working on behalf of government operatives; that's all I can safely say until I can specify the facts accurately.Skookum1 (talk) 14:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

OmniTrans Corporation

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is this the same company? I pipe-linked OmniTRAX on Peak 2 Peak Gondola.....Skookum1 (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

They are not the same. - Tim1965 (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

deletion of BC Rail Scandal

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just found this, which was removed by a SPA; cites for Omnitrax's connection to the scandal are the main focus of the trial that happened about lobbying and influence peddling and more; not the real scandal, which was CN/Campbell's, but blanking this out is questionable; I hadn't had time to cite it before; but obliterating it is highly POV. I'm assuming that the SPA is a corporate p.r. type for OmniTRAX....if not WP:DUCK. I'm sick so am not gonna take the time/energy to fix this, but anyone from WPCanada or WPTrains reading this please have a look at BC Legislature Raids for relevant cites. REally a bottomless pit.Skookum1 (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic