Talk:One of the Boys (1989 TV series)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good.
• I would expand the lead to include details from every section.

  I have expanded it slightly.

Premise and characters

• This section is well-sourced (no problems).

Production

• Reword the phrase "she do television".

  Reworded to "she enter the field".

Episodes

• This section also looks good.

Broadcast

• Great article, another section without any issues!

Critical reception

• Along with the rest, the references and prose are all in great shape!

References

• Since Newspapers.com is technically an archive website, there's no need to archive them.

  I don't think any Newspapers.com links are archived in the article, though I would have to respectfully disagree anyways because I have seen examples where the clipping url changed and it was no longer accessible without an archived url.

• All websites and authors are linked.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• @Some Dude From North Carolina: thank you very much for the review; I have responded above. I'd be happy to address any further comments. Heartfox (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)