Talk:Opel Laubfrosch
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 82.139.86.190 in topic not immediately clear just how Opel successfully defended their position
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Opel 4 PS from de.wikipedia. |
File:Opel logo 2009 .png Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Opel logo 2009 .png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
not immediately clear just how Opel successfully defended their position
editFrom the article: ‘not immediately clear just how Opel successfully defended their position’
Well, if it was a legal decision, the judgement and case documents are public, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.86.190 (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)