This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++ articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Since this can’t go into the article, but still has to be mentioned: OpenGL++ was (quite obviously too) yet another victim of the company, well-know, and endlessly convicted of what can only be called corporate serial murder/avataring, named Microsoft. Like Netscape, like Borland, like (mostly) Sun, like SCO, like Nokia, etc. In this case, it was part of their goal, to kill off OpenGL, and replace it with DirectX, which is under their control. Just for anyone who wonders, what actually went on there on the inside. — anonymous because of reasons (213.196.229.102 (talk) 11:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC))
Addendum: The other companies were partially moved out of the field my Microsoft too, for the exact purpose of Microsoft dominating. — 213.196.229.102 (talk) 11:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply