Talk:Open Dialogue Foundation

PR piece

Heavy use of non RS, e.g.

"Report - Law and Justice's Campaign against the Open Dialogue Foundation". Open Dialogue Foundation. Retrieved 1 June 2019.

I have removed a couple of them and rephrased the worst part. Other Wikipedians are welcome to remove the other ones and tag this article accordingly. Let us also look out for COI. Zezen (talk) 07:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Understood Zezen. As mentioned on my Talk page, will go through it and add RS. Will ask here if I have questions (i.e. are tweets from reputable persons like Guy Verhofstadt acceptable? or tweets not RS by default?). Thanks for your support, got a bit rusty, haven't been an active editor since ~2008, sorry.. Myciel (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Question: I've added the office address in Kiev, but I can't add the source, which is the Ukrainian registry of enterprises - get an error that the domain is blacklisted.. https://youcontrol[dot]com.ua/catalog/company_details/39366352/ What should I do with that? Myciel (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear Myciel Thank you for not taking it personally. Twitter etc. are not allowed in this very case: please reread Wp:Rs and Wp:Twitter first.

To wit, he was commenting not on himself but the other parties, so:

"(...)it does (...) involve claims about third parties;"

applies.

Also he may claim it was hacked etc. - so not official enough. Zezen (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear Zenen,

Thanks for clarifying re. Twitter, makes sense. Will seek other sources then.

Also, please see the two sections I've added, on History and activities in Kazakhstan. Are all the references RS? Phrasing okay? If so I'll add notable activities in other regions next. Thanks! Myciel (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear Myciel, Thanks for your efforts. I tend to other articles, too, so just alert me when this one is ready. FYI, this non-RS:

"ODF volunteers Facebook group". Retrieved 1 June 2019

still remains. Zezen (talk) 17:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Looks good now

Thank you, Myciel, for not being defensive, taking our criticism on board, etc. The article looks good, with RSes and little POV at first sight. Zezen (talk) 07:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Wow, thanks Zezen! Means a lot. Your guidance helped. Will keep up the good work then. Myciel (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)