Talk:Openness

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Art

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

217.161.104.2 14:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC) removed {{ContemporaryArtStub}} as I couldn't see the connection between the article and contemporary art. A contemporary issue of some sort, yes, but not art.Reply

It's still confusing. The first line says 'Openness is related to open source', but the article is tagged as a sociology stub. Which one is it? I think the software-related connotation should be mentioned, but not as the primary meaning. 81.104.214.224 22:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree. When searching for "Openness" you expect to find somthing about socialogy not software.--67.49.29.212 20:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Should this be deleted?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would like to see some references. I would be very curious to find whether anyone has used this term in reliable sources in the way the article suggests. Of course people talk about the concept; I just think other terms are used and that this article should redirect to something more commonly used. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Openness to Experience

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

is one of the Big Five personality traits.216.96.113.99 (talk) 09:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic