Talk:Operation Bertram/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) 02:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC) GAN Quicksheet 1.23 SM
(Criteria)

Starting comments: Looks interesting.

1. Well written: Section acceptable

a. prose/copyright: I moved a section around, because it felt out of place where it was. Other than that, it was fine. Acceptable

b. MoS compliance: Acceptable

2. Accurate and verifiable: Section acceptable

a. provides references: Obviously I'm assuming good faith on the printed materials. Dazzled and Deceived: Mimicry and Camouflage sounds like a fascinating read (just from the title) but I don't have any of the books. Acceptable

b. proper citation use: Acceptable

c. no original research: Acceptable

3. Broad in coverage: Section acceptable

a. covers main aspects:

b. focused/on topic:

4. Neutral:

5. Stable:

6. Image use: Section acceptable

a. license/tagging correct: Always nice to see properly done FURs. Saves me the time of fixing them.

b. relevant/properly captioned:

7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:

a. images that should have alt texts have them: Needs work Please consider doing this, as it does have a big impact on accessibility. Done.

b. general catch all and aesthetics: Meh. I don't really love the image placement, some things butt into sections they shouldn't, but it's nothing major.

Comments after the initial review: Was interesting. Little piece of history I never knew about. Solid piece of work, I'm happy to promote this. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)