Talk:Operation Desert

Requested move 29 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

---

• Operation Desert (German fuel project) → Operation Desert
• Operation Desert → Operation Desert (disambiguation)

Only name. The article Siege of Mariupol is not called Siege of Mariupol (2022) because of the Battle of Mariupol (1919). Per WP:TITLEDAB, disambiguation is only necessary when there is otherwise an actual conflict in article titles. No such conflict in titles exists. Per WP:CONCISE, concision is preferred over unnecessary precision (Like the Republic of the Congo and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Iraq War and the Iraqi conflict). Parham wiki (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

oppose is there a better name we can use per WP:CODENAME—blindlynx 14:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

@Blindlynx, I do not know. Parham wiki (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

• Support. While I note the point that has been raised about WP:CODENAME, it also seems to be the case that WP:CODENAME's guidance mainly applies to combat operations. For instance, the guideline mentions that operational codenames only represent[] one side's planning; but Operation Desert seems to have been a domestic effort to produce synthetic oil, so there isn't really an "other side" whose planning is being left out. (Indeed, when checking the categories for non-combat military operations in the US, Australia, and India, it becomes apparent that operational titles – while far from universal – are reasonably widespread for such cases.) Thus, I think retaining the operational title is worthwhile here.
  In addition to the above, I think the WP:CRITERIA favor the original proposal. Removing the disambiguator improves on naturalness and concision, without sacrificing precision or recognizability. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Energy has been notified of this discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Germany has been notified of this discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Support as there is no other "Operation Desert" topic. All the others are "Operation Desert Foo". Bermicourt (talk) 16:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.