Talk:Operation Spectrum

Neutrality.

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article could be much improved by adding informative and neutral citations, especially from non-Singaporean or at least non-mainstream sources. At present, it is heavily dependent on Straits Times articles (about half of the citations). Nigellwh (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sure, and anyone is free to add information from other reliable sources as and when they can be found. The Straits Times citations deal with the basic 'facts' of the case, at least inasmuch as it was presented to the public. It is a primary source. Also, where it presents 'facts' that have been disputed, especially by the detainees themselves, those have been highlighted. It is not the quantity of the citations from a particular source that should be of concern, but how the source has been used and quoted.

Where opinions (at the time) of Operation Spectrum are concerned, citations from contemporary non-Straits Times news outlets (Asian Wall Street Journal, Far Eastern Economic Review etc.) have been provided. There are also links to reports from human rights organisations. Those would also be primary sources.

Finally, there are various interpretations of the case cited from academics and scholarly publications.

I'm not sure what you mean by "neutral" citations from "non-mainstream" sources. According to Wikipedia guidelines (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources), the sources mentioned above are considered reliable precisely because they are 'mainstream' (at least that is what I believe you mean by mainstream). Do you mean non-mainstream such as personal memoirs? 183.90.103.191 (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Operation Spectrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic