Talk:Opinion polling for the 2022 Hungarian parliamentary election

Inconsistent color

Jobbik is once black, then dark green. I suggest to change it to consistently black, because that is the conventional color for the party in opinion polls. It also represent the far-right view. Though the party "Mi Hazánk" is mire far right. They could be represented by two different shades of black. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C1:B708:1400:55F4:FFC5:CE19:1206 (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

The austrian ÖVP also changed their color from black to turquoise. If you look at that article, it even shows the two colors in the election result tables, so I don't think this is necessarily an issue. Regarding political color, black is ambiguous, so that's not really helpful either. --Gbuvn (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Mistakes

There are a few mistakes in the table. I believe they could have been avoided.

Take a look at the last two Zavecz polls from October and September.

As you can see, Zavecz releases raw numbers that include the "no party" preferences. It would be interesting to put them somewhere, if not on the main table, now that we have enough space.

Zavecz's raw numbers always totalize 100%, but the party preferences may not: in September, it totals 101%. Should we re-do the calculation ourselves?

Another problem is Párbeszéd (Dialogue). Currently, the table does not distinguish it from MSzP. But Zavecz Research polls this party specifically. We should split the MSzP-Párbeszéd column into two, and decide case-by-case, whether the cells should be merged.

Kahlores (talk) 12:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• KDNP.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2021

Polling “institutes” such as e-benchmark and Real-PMark93 or what, arent even real and are all related to government close pages like Origo and Demokrata. Please delete them, stop using them, as they are biased towards the Government. The average person interested in politics wont realize that, if they dont live in Hungary and know how Origo M1 and all these platforms are… Justadudeee (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Stop posting polling institutes that are biased and not independent. Justadudeee (talk) 13:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

I agree with the OP, these are typical strongman tactics, ever since the leader of the opposition was announced, the pro-government media are disparaging him and are putting out a lot of these makeshift polls as they now have a face to bash, whereas previously they did not. At the very least, I suggest putting a stamp on this kind of polls, indicating that they were commissioned by a political party, and are not an indepedent research. --79.140.150.146 (talk) 06:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

How do we define neutral or biased polls... Braganza (talk) 07:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Here's aa Hungarian article about how Real Pr 93 are trying to influence voter opinion openly: https://magyarnarancs.hu/belpol/felvetel-keszult-a-kozvelemeny-kutatasnak-alcazott-befolyasolo-kampanyrol-somogyban-245659 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.39.75 (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Regional polling

The regional polling section makes no sense (for instance Fidesz-KDNP being at 40% vs 50% for the opposition when combined and yet it shows Fidesz having a lead of 22%). I understand the lead is based on the party with the highest % but this makes these results wildly inconsistent from one another and means anybody looking at these numbers might be confused (though I will admit the last one is ok since the opposition didn't unite until later). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.190.33.254 (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2022

Please change 23–25 Mar 2022 Závecz Research 800 48.8 46.4 N/A N/A 4.8 4.4 to 23–25 Mar 2022 Závecz Research 800 48.8 46.4 N/A N/A 4.8 2.4 Thanks! 2A02:AB88:3783:A400:F5F1:BB96:8970:BC6C (talk) 07:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• MiHazank Logo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• MiHazank Logo.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)